home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: access4.digex.net!not-for-mail
- From: ell@access4.digex.net (Ell)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: CRC cards Re: A few Unified Method questions
- Date: 7 Feb 1996 05:23:47 GMT
- Organization: The Universe
- Message-ID: <4f9d13$2gc@news4.digex.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: access4.digex.net
- X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0]
-
- From news3.digex.net!access1.digex.net!not-for-mail Wed Feb 7 00:04:56 1996
- Path: news3.digex.net!access1.digex.net!not-for-mail
- From: ell@access1.digex.net (Ell)
- Newsgroups: comp.object
- Subject: Re: CRC cards Re: A few Unified Method questions
- Date: 6 Feb 1996 02:25:23 GMT
- Organization: The Universe
- Lines: 20
- Message-ID: <4f6e6j$ge7@news4.digex.net>
- References: <4den9l$nl3@news4.digex.net> <4f3cks$ovf@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: access1.digex.net
- X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0]
-
- FiresmithD (firesmithd@aol.com) wrote:
- : How can you say that the Unified Method supports CRC cards? Although it
- : has added responsibilities, it does so at the operation rather than at the
- : class level which does not make sense because a single responsibility is
- : often implemented by more than one operation. Collaborators per
- : responsibility are also missing. This is one of the many weaknesses of the
- : Unified Method, which is far too oriented towards C++ at the expense of
- : Smalltalk, which is the language that gave us CRCs ala Beck/Cunningham and
- : Wirfs-Brock.
-
- Booch has responded to the points here with respect to the Unified
- Method.
-
- I would like to say although CRC may have orginated amongst computer
- scientist using Smalltalk, it has just as much applicability to C++, and
- all other oopls for that matter. My experience has shown that class
- responsibility collaboration (CRC) is the cornerstone of the most
- effective oo analysis, and design approaches.
-
- Elliott
-
-